Wood Ratings
This is my attempt at ratings my blades using the Butterfly scale. The Schlager Carbon
was used as the reference blade, so all measurements were normalized to its response.
A big thanks to seasterl, a fellow club member, physicist, and EJ who was nice enough to
develop and perform the tests.
The test was a simple drop test where a ball was dropped from a known
height onto the secured and stationary blade. The vertical rebound of
the ball was video taped with a height indicator in the background. The
camera was also positioned so as to eliminate parallax between the ball
and the scale and obtain accurate readings. The maximum rebound of
multiple drops was measured and the test was repeated to ensure
reproducible results. The height of the drop was fourteen feet so as to
maximize the spread of the measurements between the blades (as opposed
to a height of only a few feet that would be too dependent on the
blade's outer ply and might skew the results). Although somewhat
subjective, the feel of the blade was determined by actually playing
with the blade. If anyone has ideas on how to do a simple yet
reproducible dynamic test where the ball is moving at a very high rate
of speed and a blade moves during a loop stroke, please email me.
Similar tests have been performed during the evaluation of other
sporting goods, so coming up with an objective test to further evaluate
a blade's performance should be possible.
| Blade Type |
Rebound (in) |
Speed |
Stiffness |
Weight |
| WRC | 47 | 10.8 | Medium | Light |
| Am. Cedar | 47 (est) | 10.8 (est) | Very Stiff | Very Light |
| POC | 47 | 10.8 | Medium | Med/Heavy |
| BTY-SC | 45.5 | 10.5 | Very stiff | Heavy |
| AWC | 45 | 10.4 | Medium | Medium |
| NWC | 45 | 10.2 | Soft | Light |
| Basswood | 44 | 10.4 | Soft-Medium | Medium |
| Sitka Spruce | 41 | 9.5 | Stiff | Med/Heavy |
| Corkenstein | 30 | 6.9 | Soft | Light |
| Note: Test performed with no rubber on blade |